Day in the Life

Aug 20, 1890

Journal Entry

August 20, 1890 ~ Wednesday

20 We road to Sandford 8 mils to Bishop Bertholsons
Brother Cannon was quite unwell we met at 11 oclok
and George Godard prayed J F Smith spoke 35 M[inutes],
G Q Cannon 30 W Woodruff 25 m[inutes] I signed 7 recommends
I visited an Altar in a prayer room. At the close of
the meeting we took carriages at Alamosa with
Legrand Laton, Wm W Durkee, & N A James we
rode to Zapato 3 1/2 hours we reached a part of the ranch
& spent the night at Mr Layton Distance 23 Miles
Mr Jann had a kennel of about a Doz Blooded Dogs
I had a free talk with Mr Layton on Mormonism
I told him some of my Experience Brother Silas S Smith
& F A Hammond had purchased this part of their
Ranch

People

Browse people Wilford Woodruff mentioned on this day in his journal. Click on the person's name to view a short bio and other pages they are mentioned on or click on "View in Family Search" to view their FamilySearch profile.

Hammond, Francis Asbury
1 Nov 1822 - 27 Nov 1900
Goddard, George
5 Dec 1815 - 12 Jan 1899
Cannon, George Quayle
11 Jan 1827 - 12 Apr 1901
2243 mentions
Apostle
Smith, Joseph Fielding
13 Nov 1838 - 19 Nov 1918
4110 mentions
Apostle
Smith, Silas Sanford
20 Oct 1830 - 11 Oct 1910
52 mentions
Missionary

Places

Browse places mentioned in Wilford Woodruff's journal entry on this day. Click on the place names to view other pages where they are mentioned.

Related Documents

Browse other documents with this same date. These could include pages from Wilford Woodruff's autobiographies, daybooks, letters, histories, and personal papers. Click on the document titles to view the full document.

Letter from Lot Smith, 20 August 1890
Farmington, President Wilford Woodruff, Salt Lake City, Utah. Dear Brother: I have rec'd yours of June 19 and Aug. 11. In your first you state you have been informed that I owe Bro. Farnsworth. I do not owe him one cent according to the decision of the High Council. There is this little quirk about it. Bp. Brinkerhoff or Farnsworth owed me eighty-seven dollars. They both admitted it to be Farnsworth. When the Brethren, James B. Ashcroft and John Q. Adams went to pay him the money for me according to the decision of the high council, they asked him if he was willing to credit the eighty seven dollars he was owing me, he replied that he was and had tried to get the high council to consider it in their decision, but they had refused. You say that you understood from me that I had paid Farnsworth. You must You must surely have got that understanding because I stated it so plainly. I refer you to James B. Ashcroft of Ramah, New Mexico or John Q. Admams of Tuba City, Ariz- ona for the correctness of this statement. What Bro. Bigham? heard in regard to my turning out families and burning their habitations, as you state in your last communication is not correct. It may have originated from this. When I returned from Mexico some three years ago I found Isaac Duffin was living at the dairy, by permission of my son J. H. Smith. I told my son I regretted that he had allowed them to come their (there) because he had a bad record in Utah. Afterwards his brother-in-law Wm. Lamb came to the ranch and asked for imployment, stated that he had been poorly raised, hoped I would be a father to him and teach him. I employed him, then he brought his brother, Preston Lamb, from Utah. They by my permission built a little one roomed log house on the ranch one mile and a half south of the dairy. Duffin stealing nails and lumber and in fact nearly all the building material from the dairy. It was not so that I could visit the ranch, but I had learned how Duffin was conducting himself. I told Lamb I wanted to get Duffin off from the ranch— I did not know then that they were stealing cattle and horses from the ranch. Lamb told me that his sister wanted to leave Duffin and wished to know how much I would give her for the house. I told him that I would give her every cent it was worth, if Duffin would promise not to come back to that section of the country. Duffin left with his family and went to Apacha county. I afterwards was convinced that the Lambs were stealing from me and other ranches near by so I discharged Lamb. Then my sons J. H. and H. B. Smith said I had ought to get him off the ranch. I asked what harm can he do? if he stole the young calf, they would go back to their mothers with his marks on them and I would know them. Jed says "Their mothers will never trouble them." I says, "You don't mean to say they will kill the Mother." I had heard of such things being done. Jed said, "That's just what they will do." Now you can not get any good proof against a man on an unmarked calf and a dead mother. Your not being a cow boy I tell you of this diabolical way they have of increasing their herds. I was paying Lamb ninty dollars per month, giving him feside the use of all the land he wanted to plant and all the cows he choose to milk, and there were many other pickings from the ranch. He came to me poor and went away better off than any of the Lambs I ever knew or heard of. He acknowledged that no one had ever been as kind to him as I. He agreed to leave the the ranch altogether. I offered to furnish hands to help him gather his stock for nothing. They went away, stayed during the winter but reported that they would come back and take possession of the dairy property, that I had more than I could hold.
Letter from Ward Eaton Pack Sr., 20 August 1890
Laie Oahu Prist W. Woodruff Dear Brother, I feel it a duty and a pleasure to write you from time to time that you may know of our of our condition and prospects in this Mission. The Brethren who are traveling and preaching seem to feel encouraged in their labors, still, like their forefathers this is a back sliding people and it requires much patience and labor to keep to keep those who have received the Gospel near the line of their duty. So we some times think that in a small degree we can appreciate the efforts and anxiety of our older and more experienced brethren who are constantly laboring to direct the Saints in the path of duty. In the various Conferences of this Mission there are those who are accepting the Gospel, and there are those who are falling away. All together however we feel that the church here is in a healthy condition. We also feel that that the interest of the plantations are being looked after as well as the circumstances will permit. We have been bothered considerable to procure a sufficient number of laborers to carry out the work as we would like. The people have been bothered by sickness tho four months hereto past and many who are here are old men, and old women, old saints, kind of pensioners who cannot perform much labor. There is not enough able bodied saints here to do the work of the plantation as it should be done. If we had twenty five additional able bodied men it would be to our

Events

View selected events in the two months surrounding this date in Wilford Woodruff's life. Click on the dates to jump to that day in Wilford Woodruff's journal.

Frank H. Dyer resigns as receiver under accusations of malfeasance of Church property and is replaced by Henry W. Lawrence.
Majority of members of the Church attending General Conference sustain the Manifesto.

Aug 20, 1890